Si è verificato un errore nel gadget

mercoledì 28 aprile 2010

Cut the crap, get to the point, and the point is...:

Today a friend of mine forwarded me a youtube link to a film criticyzing mansonery.

Here is my oppinion: All crap!

Lots of crap.

Masons and other organisations hide behind transcedental and secrets and stuff, but they really are out there for thye money
… power
… reciprocal refferals
… just like comunists
… fascists
… imperialists
… liberals
… conservators
… whighs
… and thors
... and.. you name it, they are doomed,
all ful of bulshit, none true and honest.

… so to me masons, commies, fscists and nazi, makes no diffrence!

If they where true and honest, they would have nothing to hide.

Than add some religions like catholics, orthodox, jewish, muslim, buddist, shinto, thaoists and stuff, and you have the picture.

Forget them, you don't have to live with their crap hanging on your neck.

Mind your business and forget of them.

All those that do not practice and/or preace what they claim to be true. And wander of on some other path.

Jesus said:
" … what do you care about him, you follow me!"

… so what do you care about them?
"Prove ye with All THings, and hold fast to what is good"

Exactly, do so and live happily

You owe them nothing, so don't stumble in their positions, look only at Jesus and God, skip the church and their intereses.

They've put themselves in the way to make a buck, skip TV too, worthless, a mere tool to full folks.

Use the brain.

God said "do as I do"

And he shurely uses the brains he has.

Why shouldn't you?

I do.

venerdì 23 aprile 2010

Wonderful minds and souls!

People say they have to have all those gadgets, but still use the old writing to send and receive messages, some even have 3 cell phones, and a laptop, and keep sending and receiving messages.

Becouse they wanna keep in touch and not to loose their heritage!

Maybe, but not necesarely.

Some behave like drugadicts, storing all kind of mesages just to feel they have friends, some delete almost everything and keep the essentials (I do so)

It depends on the self esteem and interior beauty.

Look around, those that have more earings, jewleries, electronic toys, and try to be perfect outside, they are the most miserable inside, ugly souls, desperate people, maybe rich, smart, but desperate.

The few that look simple, those are the be worshiped. Wonderful minds that need not to be reassured they have friends, for they know exctly who is a friend and how much, and they respect that.

People that need no barber everyday, or cosmetician, to feel accepted and alive.

People that need no drughs or thousands of messages to feel comfortable with themselves.

People that need not to show up, drink hard, dance in the middle of the dancing floor and be admired by all, to feel they are worth something.

Real people, that rely on their inner strenght.

Not many around thou, and this is the kind of friends I accept around me without blinking.

They are value to my mind!

domenica 18 aprile 2010

People say universityes are capable of research, but incapable of comercialisation of their results!

Partially I agree with you, but partially, say 90% I am afraid I won't.

No hard feelings, just personal experience, negative one, with universities.

I invented an engine (it's in my profile) and looked for a lab to prototype and calculate it.

Called universityes and tech labs, the ammount they wanted from me was 8 milions of euro, 8 years ago.

I said " can't we put this in one of your programs with students, I gain a prototype, you gain a research, students gain credits and CV"

No way Hose, eight millions or get outa here!

I won't make names, but they are famous ones.

Than digging, with the help of friends, I get to meet an internal combustion guru, the one that designed and engineered the Aprilia motors.

60 yars old, modest man, with a small lab in the garage and the office in the room above it.

He signed my NCND without blinking (the others didn't) took a look at my patent papers and drawings, and asked me 2 weeks to think of.

Two weeks later I was in his office again, a sunday, and he starts to talk, "we do this, we do that, the main problem is the sealing here, and the most complex machining is on this delicate part, etc"

"Wait a minute" I said, while he was laying out drawings he worked all week on, "We haven't agreed on the money part yet, how am I going to pay you on all this, I might even not have all that money"

"Forget the moeny" he said, I love your idea, can we partner? I want 25% of it, and share 25% of risks and expenses"

I wasn't stupid, his offer was like a once in a life time, so i said YES SIR!

He wasn't stupid either, he realised the market and technologicall value of this project.

Than I asked him how much would of costed me the prototype if we wouldn't partnered on it.

Fifty thousand, he said.

I told him than of what the universityes told me, and he said:

" Right kid, this is what they ask, and you know what else? They are not even capable to do the job.
Yap, they come to me or the other 2 or 3 like me in this country, we are not many capable to do this job, and offer us some 50.000 to do it for them, and the rest of the money they eat it"

My advice to the REAL inventors is to avoid universityes, but dig, dig, and dig untill you find the REAL dude behind their fame, the modest man that really works and really knows, and go straight to him and make the deal.

Trash universityes, they are but mediocres, even at stealing you, not to speack of the profession they are supposed to know.

Mind your business, and trash the Academicians, they are not worth the air they are breathing!

mercoledì 14 aprile 2010

Who is behind the death of the Poland president?

Who is behind the death of the Poland president?

I am not a polish man, nor love them, neither hate them, thus totally ignorant of their matters.
What I am not ignorant of is airplanes and airports. Not that I would be a great specialist of this, but I boast I know enough to see a scam where there is a scam.
Let’s analyze airports.
A strip of asphalt or concrete, wide enough to contain authorized flight machines, and long enough to allow takeoff of authorized flight machines in less than half the length, the rest of it is to be used in case of take off abort to stop the plane safely.
There are left and right of the runway two “respect zones”, that is land along the runway without trees, pillars, buildings or ditches where the plane can end up at any speed without endangering anything. Most of the times they are wide four to ten times more than the runway, each. Airports where they are less than double the width the runway are considered “Special” and one needs to pass exams to can land there, Smolensk is not the case. Just go over with Google earth and see the airport.
Any damn airport has RADAR and APROACH instrumental systems, Smolensk is a former (and still) military airport, thus equipped more than a regular civilian one.
Radar helps the tower monitor the airspace and direct traffic.
Approach system helps pilots land in fog and rain and tempest. The only conditions when radar and approach systems are useless is ice and snow, but when the Poland presidential aircraft landed this was not the case.
How is the damn approach system work? Easy, like a laser guide, but on radio waves.
Imagine a Star Wars Laser canon that fires those light blue laser lines. Ok.
We put one of those shooting radio coded waves at the end of the runway. Than we tilt it to match the landing approach path that normally the pilot sees it naked eyes, but now we are in a foggy day.
On every airplane there is another canon, beneath the belly somewhere, that shoots nothing. But receives the said approach signal. This canon is slightly low on nose, so that when the radio beam from the runway enters perfectly into the airplane canon, they are 100% in line, the flight machine will be in perfect landing asset, perfectly oriented on the landing path, and can land even without a pilot, all it has to do is maintain the asset and landing speed until the touchdown that occurs a bit after the runway canon position.
Even a twelve years old blind kid can land this way.
Imagine also that the presidential flight pilots were former military pilots knowing the machine as they knew their pockets, and at least one of them landed on Smolensk airport more than once, I presume.
Imagine that the Soviet made airplane was recently overhauled, thus brought to “brand new” in all of its systems. We talk of a very safe flight machine used by military and civilian airlines, that lands in Siberia in heavy storms no problem, build in hundreds of copies, that if not blown up by terrorists, until now has a positive crash report more above the media of many western build airplanes.
Now how can such a safe machine, with such experimented crew, on a regularly equipped airport crush?
Let’s play:
With the control tower first, so the Poland head of state comes in, Moscow is not much happy with, and all of a sudden the crew that should be on duty in the tower today receives a day off, and another crew is called to take over. I have no evidence on this theory, but I bet my salary that if dug deep someone can find that this happened at Smolensk.
A crew with a special task, and they did a damn good job, nobody survived!
And someone is sent to modify the landing path canon angle, from slightly over ground shooting, to 45 degrees in vertical. And the new control tower occupants know of it, but pretend nothing changed.

Results:

The pilot trusts the instruments, thus if they say he is in landing path and in position, is all truth, all this electronics won’t lie suddenly. But the electronic on board is made in Russia, and the control tower is on the Russian hands, and they know how …
The landing speed let’s make it at some 300 Km per hour (200 miles per hour something) this is a big bird.
And it needs 2 KM to stop, this is way over a mile.
The only problem is that the plane instead of being a bit nosed up, is a bit nosed down, since instruments are lying to the pilots, the horizontal speed is 300, but the vertical speed is not 2 as it should be, but 200.
The airplane is not coming slightly down, but crushing suddenly.
The tower tells them to go Moscow, so that the president won’t reach the event, just to cover the radio registrations with press releasable materials, since they are trained to sabotage the landing in a perfectly credible manner.
But the Poland president is stubborn, and the pilots too, so they try, retry and try again.
At the fourth attempt they hit the ground with a 200 Km per hour vertical speed (120 Mph or so)
Nobody can live such impact, not even in an airplane.
Then somebody shifts back the runway canon to almost horizontal position unseen in the fog and with all those rescue teams going to the crush site, not to the approach system position.
And they collect the black boxes of the airplane, Russian made too, so they can change a bit the data that would reveal the truth, before they hand them to the experts to see why the plane crushed.
Some “trustwothy” voices spread the news that this airplane was know as unsafe and having a bad crush history (Strange that a state president would chose a bad machine to have him go round!)
Some other voices would spread the news that it was the pilot's fault, so the pattern is set. The espionage machine is wel oiled and having people all over the world, all they have to do is tell them when and what to say.
The other state presidents won't move a finger, they don't want their airplanes to crush by mistake too!
End of the games.
Question:
Who is behind this? And why?

sabato 10 aprile 2010

Teaching God to computer scientists

Teaching GOD to computer scientists


There’s hardware and there’s software:
Is there any hardware that is of any use without a software?
Is there any software that is of any Use without a hardware?
Is there any software that can be taken from the hardware and relocated in another machine?
Is there any computer that can presume or claim that its existence is the effect of random evolution?
Are there software that can run on any given hardware?
Are there hardware that can stand any given software?

Somebody made one and somebody made the other. With defined standards and purposes in mind.
And with a lot of bugs, thus debugging process steps in, and a selection of machines and codes survive the process, while the others are junked.

In the beginning there was the idea.
Since we are humans and express our ideas by words of mouth, and by written words, and when we only think it, we think it in words of the language we speak. The trouble is when we speak currently more than one language, and start formulating ideas that start in a language, go ahead in a second one and end up in the third one in the same sentence. Which is clear in our brain, but when expressed to someone that knows only one of the languages we speak, all we do is give them more confusion.
Therefore, in the beginning it was the idea, that we express them in words, thus: In the beginning it was the Word.
And the dude with the idea crafted it to the form of a hardware, an extremely complex one, than a more complex one, with different functions, and after a long period spent in crafting hardware, we have all kind of machines around doing all wacky stuff.
Computerized laundry machines, computerized automobiles, cranes, airplanes, vacuum cleaners, microwaves, cell phones, laptops, desktops, watches, you name it, it has a chip inside.
Some are actively computer directed like laptops, some passively, like microwaves and clocks.
But the hardware needs instructions, thus somebody wrote codes to instruct them, codes to give them input when they need to shift from an operation to another, codes that protect them from viruses, codes, codes, codes…
And somebody wrote codes to have them interact, exchange information, Bluetooth, Ethernet, wireless.
And somebody decided to have them interact independently and keep control on the results only, and communicate to the other code writers the development of the processes. Via internet.
No machine can communicate with another machine if the creators don’t allow this to happen.
No machine exists without the will of its creators.
No machine can survive and be useful to itself or others in a different environment that the one it was conceived for.
But software can.
Software can evolve outside the control of it’s creator.
Software can be modified by somebody else without being there, or without even knowing where and what is modified, just by simply sending a piece of code that does this or that to any software that matches the criteria, if allowed to enter that machine.
Virus.

Thus a Windows virus will do harm or steal info from all the windows machines met.
But is not capable to do the same on Linux or it’s brothers Mac OS, Sun Solaris, or on their grandpa’ Unix.
So antivirus was born, a piece of code that aims to contain as many virus codes embedded so that it might recognize them when passing, and kill them.
But for this a barrier must be placed and all incoming info must be filtered through it, Firewall.
And the doctor heals the incoming info in a rhythm that slows down the flow, thus we have security, but we pay a price for it, we don’t have speed any longer.


Recapitulating, in the beginning there was the word, and the word became flesh and dwelled among us.

The above short sentence covers several years, gazillions of years in our time measuring system.

Yes, SYSTEM.
We live in a pre determinate time/space system that we cannot leave. Actually we cannot leave our own solar system yet, but we dream of.

If pre determined, than by whom?


Pieces of codes regulate the existence, movements and transformations of anything existing in this system, time passing included.
Many pieces of codes, some of us discovered a little bit of them and made history:
Archimedes, Galileo, Euclides, Pythagoras, Newton, Einstein, Coanda, Bernoulli, Kepler, Fahrenheit, Celsius, Kelvin, Doppler, and the list could go ahead on pages and pages.
We talk of macro laws that uniformly govern in harmony the things in the universe.
Than others discovered and made use of laws that govern little things alone, such as the human body, the human mind, or dogs, or electricity, or light, or some chemicals. Their list is humongous.

Bottom line is, we know little or nothing of all the codes that run in this universe, but we managed to understand a fraction of the software by observing it’s results, mainly, but also by deducing other possibilities calculating missing parts of information out of the already secured one in our pockets.

Very little fraction.
Is there any parallel given universe with different rules and laws made by the same crafter? Not impossible, we have build many different computers and operating systems here, why couldn’t he do the same?
When we build a hardware, a machine, by the trade logic we tend to give it a limited warranty, so that some years later when we would of being able to build a better one, to can sell it to replace the old one.
Evolution.
We are evolving machines too, physically in a certain aspect, but mentally much more.
Our hardware has imbedded into its organs the aging process. We are born to die in our hardware.
Our software has a different destination thou!
Our software comes to life with two different code packages that complete each other:
“Number one” is aimed to manage the body, surviving, essentials as hearth beat, digestion, need of affection and need to give love, need to reproduce and care for the breed.
“Number two” is aimed to evolve, this one is a learning piece of code. We learn since day one we are conceived, and start our unconscious learning curve the day one we are born.
This makes any unborn fetus a living being. Although the law says that before 3 months from conception they are but meat!
Our law, not HIS!

Software “number two” has potential but could not exist without “number one”. “Number one” keeps the machine alive. They are inseparable, one soul!
Theory and some medical evidence proved that some folks have more than one “number two” software, but only one “number one”, multiple personality disorder, but one machine driver. Never met one of them yet, but I would love to, interesting choice to have more than one OS on a machine, alternating their work, obviously this is bringing more stress on the driver and could wreck it. The hardware too.
Odd enough, seemingly our main code writer decided that writing all the codes step by step would of being a stupid idea, so “number two” software in us writes its own codes as learned while the hardware is growing old and gets completed according to “number one” software.
“Number two” evolves according to environment, in different convictions, different language, different culture.
Some “number two” are luckier and live in more than one culture/language/environment than others thus broader knowledge, more evolved.
Some are constrained into a narrow environment, limited language, thought to be proud of themselves and kill all that say they are dumb, because they are dumb. Military for instance, CIA, FBI, KGB, MOSAD, talebans, religions, and other similar organizations. Politics too. They are a loss for the humanity.
Some hardware seem to have only “number one” software embedded, and don’t even move around much, we call them vegetables. Some humans turn vegetables too since “number two” software is no more responding to society, but “number one” is working fine thank you!
So sooner or later, by natural evolution or by hand of some idiot, or hardware ceases to exist. And start the recycling process that makes us become raw material for next generations. No junk left around by or creator, all turns back into the recycling factory of mother nature.
We didn’t reached this perfection yet with our junk as human society.
However it seems that the code writer has not much esteem of our hardware or the sufferance this is bringing into our software, since he allows natural disasters, sickness, and ultimately the human made disasters to kill many lives, plants animals and humans, this brings me to the conclusion that the hardware is just a temporary means in our evolving process, the rest is yet to come.
What happens to the software than?
According to the little revelation that our creator sneaked us beneath the history door in a letter that most people read it to see how can they use the others to make a buck, instead of reading it for what it is, “instructions manual” for the use of “number two” software by itself; HE provided from the very beginning a way to recover all software personalities at the death of the hardware by some backup means that he would not reveal to us for safety reasons.
The said back up device contains one soul alone, thus one storage driver per soul.
Some religion claim the software is reset to zero and reintroduced into trade in new machines of lower responsibility if the previous life was a total wreck, or higher responsibility if the past life was a positive walk.
Reincarnation.
Should you be the code writer, after all this fatigue, would you just erase a good amount of knowledge to start from scratch?
Neither HIM I am afraid, thus to me reincarnation ain’t!

HIS letter thou mentions that the software will be stored in a warehouse somewhere, than recovered on more evolved machines that need not all the energy we learned to consume here in order to live.
And at the time, those that evolved into a positive attitude according to his standards will be granted to enjoy a different experience at a higher level, collaborating with the code writer forever on some thrilling projects, and being treated as family and friends.
Those that instead accepted to be corrupted by a virus, lowering their firewall standards, and turning off their antivirus machine, thus having evolved in an unwanted pattern by choice, will be discharged, or something like that, but not erased. They will be placed into another environment to serve an unknown purpose to me, however it seems a pretty painful environment from the description.

Not an easy task understanding GOD, not even with all the technology today, and all the knowledge we have.
Maybe because understanding GOD is not the purpose we exist for, but shaping us in such a manner that we can fit into the big design of “Afterlife” where we shall do some code writing on who knows what other project, universe, or else.


Copyrighted by Emil Pop, 2010, all rights reserved.