Irrefutable science.

Factual irrefutable science has always being:

Lots of confabulation based on precision guess work mathematically derived from imaginary numbers in lack of facts, derived from assumptions made on known theories and accepted as absolute reality, that covers less than nothing out of the entirety.

Theories now deemed obsolete by the same science once evolved, and now known as ¨full of flaws on the base of new acquired knowledge¨ and the newly theories derived from.

Which ¨new theories¨, based on past experience, cover themselves less than nothing compared with what it is out there to be known, and thus expected to be full of flaws and absolutely untrustable as soon as more knowledge is acquired, but sold again as the absolute truth that covers them all aspects possible and impossible, thus infallible, just like the old ones in the past.

Big Bang never existed, according to the new theories, that invalidate the conclusions of the old one now incorporated as a tinny part of the new ones.

I ask myself what ¨future new knowledge¨ will invalidate out of the nowadays ¨absolute truth¨ sold as irrefutable by the so called science that behave and always have behaved more like a religion than like what it would of being expected from science.