sabato 22 novembre 2025

The fake dichotomy between Electric Motor Vehicoles and Piston Motor Vehicles (and what they hide from you)



No, they do not expect us to all drive EVs.

They know these EVs will never fly. The issue is mobility. They are throwing people a carrot to get them out of the ICE cars then the EVs are next.

You will not be able to afford to charge them. Your taxes will go up because they chew the crap out of the roads, you will have to replace tires all the times again because these monsters are so heavy they chew up the roads and your tires (and the tires will be unaffordable expensive).

Then car insurance will soar because if you damage the battery in one of these babies they must be totalled and that will cost another unaffordable amount to replace and if you hit some one with these cars the damage will be catastrophic because again they are extremely heavy.

The war is NOT against fossil fuels. The war is against mobility. They want you out of your car, unable to travel outside your 15 Minute City so they can monitor and control everything you do and say.

WAKE UP. Buy an EV and you are helping the demise of mobility. The issue is NEVER the issue.

David Alexander McCauley

1. There are plenty of people who don't want personal cars. And with the advances in driver-less cars the real question is will owning a personal vehicle regardless of its fuel source be a thing?

David Alexander McCauley

2. They are developing batteries out of hemp, yet another use for that wonderful plant, which I imagine would bring the battery price down substantially since hemp is a plant and renewable. Keep an eye on how batteries are made.

David Alexander McCauley

3. If you're worried about long distance travel why are we not using trains more?
Seriously why is Canada and the U.S. so obsessed with cars when they could have bullet trains or maglevs running across the continent?
Also cars moving within a city usually have speed limits imposed on them for safety sake.
So really you're not really going that far or fast for an urban commute half the time. I know because I routinely compare the time it takes me to walk from a to b compared to taking the bus. Usually it's faster to walk there.
Like I really don't understand why you are such an advocate for big oil and car culture when the tech to free us of reliance on such things exists.

David Alexander McCauley

4. Have you not heard of the hydrogen fuel cell aka the water powered car?

Pop Emil

You give me the impression you have no clue what I am talking about, neither what are you talking about, but you are talking nonetheless, enthusiastically.

Today I minced 400 miles going places without any train connection if not going around and doing what I accomplished in 15 hours in maybe.... 3 days.

David Alexander McCauley

you are trying to criticize my logic while not making a rational rebuttable and butchering your statement with spelling errors and bad grammar?

So what if you chose not to, or couldn't take the train.
That isn't a point in your favor.
The point is that there should be an adequate high speed public transit network that doesn't rely on fossil fuels so people don't need cars.
The fact you're bitching about car ownership so bad just proves that point.
Why would owning a vehicle be important if you had a public transit system connecting communities and that spanned the continent?
Okay you'd want a personal vehicle to explore or go off into the wilderness but how many people do that?
The majority of people live in cities or even just stay at home in suburban or rural areas.
How many people make a point of going off out in the wilderness?
Because that is the ONLY real valid use I can think for a personal vehicle vs a comprehensive public transit hub, self driving cars and maglevs for long distance transit.

Pop Emil

to start with, my grammar errors are not my problem, but of those that hunt for them, deal with it, I don't care.

Than talking about fallacies, I live in a large city, but my work takes me to everywhere from farms 100 miles away to other cities, villages and sometimes countries, traveling by public transport or electric vehicles would raise my costs from triple to 10 times fold, and my travel time from ten times fold upwards, things that I could sort out in one day take four days and 3 hotel nights, talking of simple logic.

Like me is 30% of Earth population at least, the rest of you, the 15 minutes people, can do whatever you want.

But without us your nice and cozy Megalopolis would crumble into deep shit and rubble in a decade, so with all the hate you have towards us, we keep you alive and out of a dystopian world so you can worship your goddess Greta.

I think we should simply stop and let you fix your own problems, that would be fair enough.

This way the Earth population would be reduced to half a billion in a decade due to starvation and diseases sprung from non collecting your garbage and not cleaning your sewage, not feeding you with our work and the resulting food that you consume while hunting grammar errors of us online and doing nothing else to make this world better, and the rest of us, those that actually do something, half a billion of engineers, farmers, agriculturist, vehicle drivers, etc, that travel a lot for for work and for fun, would finally enjoy living on this planet instead of slaving ourselves out of any time to have fun just to keep you alive to criticize us while doing nothing to help us save your arses.

And if "owning a vehicle to go into the wilderness to explore it" is "the only way you can think of it" than sorry my friend, besides the outrageous fallacies in your (so called) logic, you don't even do much thinking either, at least not the type that is anchored into reality.

(you may notice this is the last reply, I have never heard from him again)

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento