skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Kaku San (don't ask me how is this sound in Romanian culture, you don't wanna know ) each time our civilization had a boom was because disruptive science (not intentionally, pun intended) has put on the plate something that caught the minds of everybody in short time.
Automobiles, industry, aviation, mass production, each kaboom-ed in folks heads, and hence we have the world we have, space flight kaboom-ed in a few peoples head, hence Sci-Fi, but the others are more fascinated about it than interested to do it, hence no kaboom there.
Thus we are grounded, no business sense solutions there yet.
Aaaa... that was the introduction, now the example:
Computers Kaboom, big time in short time, now we have computers in our pocket that have a telephone app in them, yerp, they art not telephones anymore, but have a phone app to keep that side of business alive.
Now the question:
What is the next kaboom, really, no SF with going to Mars to find some more water.
My hint is 3D printers is that new Kaboom, already rep-rap printers can be afforded by a third world dude that has a steady job, saving 2 years they can buy it, me I have to save one week only, but I live in UK.
There are 3D printers for other materials (SLT) that cost little, and there are 3D printers that can print with metals or ceramics but they cost an eye and a kidney for now, however previously they cost an army of kidneys each, and that's a huge discount we have, I could buy one with my 3 years of salary, like a Porsche.
My vision is that in 20 years from now everybody will have 3D printers in their house, printing various materials, even large size printers (I designed one that can print a whole car-boat-experimental airplane sizes of components) and they can be used to print with iron, steel, titanium, plastic, carbon fiber, cement, ceramics, meat, leather or hell knows what else we might be able to invent as printing ink.
That would lead to huge transformations in society, many manufacturing places will vanish, people will print their own shit home, from downloaded files or their own drawings, be it ordered bespoke or DIY like I do.
Manufacturing will plunge to either raw materials for printers (they can print themselves out for 95% to self repair) or critical components for them, or manufacturing of not printable things, and that will change the face of earth and society at least as much as the industrial revolution did a couple of hundreds of years ago, it will just not happen in 100 years time frame, but far faster.
Now that is something I would like to talk to you about, and why hell not, even do something about it to make it happen.
To get in touch with me, I don't think you need any indications.
Thorn out socks you sew them, around a light bulb as support.
Learn to fix, remediate, repair, adjust, sewing, gluing, welding, threading, seeding and planting.
Not that there is no money to buy new ones, most of them are dirty cheap anyway.
But because like today you bin the worn socks instead of fixing them.
Tomorrow you bin the underwear for same reason.
Day after tomorrow you bin a shirt instead of repairing it.
Or the laptop, or the phone because.. out of fashion in 5 months from new.
Next week you don't like the beans you wife cooked so you divorce her and get a new one.
In a month you get fed with the kids that disobey and don't do their homework as told and when told to, so you give them away to an orphanage and get some new ones, more to your taste.
The Consumption Society, if you get fed with the wife, kids, car, phone, socks, house, you bin it and replace it with a new and improved version, more in fashion.
Ain't that Biblical?
Dignifying and elegant life does not mean
- new things to wear and use
- famous brands
- with nice big logo
- because trendy now
Nope
Dignifying and elegant life means:
- made by yourself
- by your hands or somebody you know
- fixed if was broken
- adjusted if it needed, marriage included
- sewed in place if worn
- made better when possible
- permanently maintained by personal care
- kept alive with love
Works for the family too, that is what it means living with dignity, elegant and biblical.
The big problem of the people in Africa is they want to have everything white people (or Chinese or Japanese people or South Americans) have without inventing it themselves, wihtout creating it themselves, just like that, pof... the genie of the lamp made it happen for you.
They want cars; Mercedes, Toyota, Chrisler, etc, invented bit by bit, piece by piece, including the technology to make them, during over 4000 years of slow but steady progress in science of metals, design, plastics, thermodynamics by; Europeans, Japanese, Chinese, etc, but without taking part in the effort of creating those technologies, without getting their hands dirty into designing, understanding, making.
I saw absurdly smart African geniuses aged 10 to 60 years old taking apart European technologies, fixing them without instructions, modifying them without instructions, using American, European, Asian tools like welding machines, milling machines, drilling machines, cement, lime, whatever, without schooling and without having instructors, so they are not stupid:
but the culture is stupid, preventing those geniuses to grow and give back technlogy, them worked in absurdly improper conditions on a dusty flor of dried mud contaminating the parts with dust from just walking around, because nobody explained them the damage they do to the technology by not keeping the tools clean inside out.
And what the rich Africans do?
Buy ready made in Europe and shit on the local geniuses, disconsider them, piss on their head, hire bodyguards to beat them at the end of a job instead of paying them, robing them of their work.
No way the African culture can achieve any progress like that, ever.
You must change the culture, you want to have European and American advantages, stop buying them ready made, treat your local geniuses well, pay them, repect them, send them to teach eachother, make your own univeristies, not for the rich, but for the geniuses that can bring you progress at the same level with us, because this is how we do it.
Taking US or France or Belgium or Dutch or UK bribes to keep your nations in slavery and steal your nations wealth is not going to achieve that, sending your youth to schools in Europe is a waste since they know that returning in Africa for them it means losing status, so they stay here and the countries that you send them into are harvesting their geniality for a profit while Africa loses them, their geniality, and it's own future.
Change the way you approach the African poor people, treat them like the geniuses they are, and in return you will lift Africa to European levels of civilisation (which is far from perfection, but for now is the best we have, everybody copied it, US, The Americas, Asia, Australia, because for now there is no better, but they copied the right thing: schools and respect for brainiacs even if poor, and in donating to poor geniuses money for schooling, tools, studies and travel to meet other geniuses to exchange know how)
Anda Andrei
Graph with the level of temperature and CO2 in different geological eras.
It is observed that there were periods with low levels of CO2, but high temperatures, but also with high levels of CO2, and very low temperatures.
There is NO causal link between the level of carbon dioxide and the temperature of the planet.
Pop Emil:
At the moment the planet suffers from a lack of CO2 close to the level of plant extinction, and we are following them.
The level of CO2 must be almost doubled to have jungles again in the current deserts.
Anda Andrei:
Pop Emil - Correct, and I'll explain why, for those who don't know.
A high level of CO2 is really favorable for plants and helps them survive in arid conditions much better.
On the surface of the leaves there are some pores/stomata, which are open to absorb atmospheric air with CO2 in it. If the level of atmospheric CO2 is low, the pores must stay open longer, which also leads to the evaporation of water from the plants.
Plants need more water if the CO2 level in the air is low.
But if the CO2 level is higher, then the plants can close their pores faster, which means that they will not lose so much water from inside them and will need less water, so they will survive in arid conditions.
A higher amount of CO2 helps to plant desert areas more easily and to shrink these areas.
Pop Emil:
Anda Andrei, well, you're a candidate for my blog, and I'm going to hit the Greta brats and break their noses with your partecipation...
Things never change but for the fools, they just evolve untill fools think is something new, but it is not, just an eveolution of whatever already existed, maybe more complex, maybe more complicated to analise, but still basically same thing recombined and remasterd.
I took a one years nights course in electronics when I was like 16 and studied all those things to can fix colour TV sets and computers, but is long time I have not used them; at the time computers still had visible resistors and capacitors in them... lol
That happened in the past millenium, mind yo how old am I.
Vacuum tubes electronics are more or less over, semiconductor transistors were invented not so long time afterwards.
Still some projects cannot do without them, including at CERN and vacuum tubes had transistors, diodes, etc.
The thing was moving to semiconductor materials from vacuum tubes but the basiscs remained, resistors, capacitors, diodas, transistors.
The problme that arised was the smaller the component the less room was available for markings like value, tollerance, etc. So they came up with the colour code.
Today witht he hyper miniaturisation when a chip the size of my fingernail and similar thickness has millions of this components inside, not even colour code works anymore, let alone repairing the chip for a fried transistor by replacing it, now you toss the whole chip and put a new one instead.
Employers have degrees themselves and zero skills, and want to pay skills like they pay degrees, and as a consequnece they don't find skills, all they find and hire is degrees, skills they find on the free lance sector, self employed people, and pay dearly each time they need them.
And this is why corporations and governments are going down the drain, for all they have is a bunch of papaer degrees hoarders with next to no skills.
Also becuase even the degree hoarders when they get skilled, and realise they are seriously underpaid for their skills, move over into the free lance sector and start making money for real, and even hide the fact that they have degrees, they pretend to be almost illiterate, and only sell their skills; that are paid far better out of desperation to get things done, while degrees are paid peanuts just to show up, so that the corporation/government agency/etc. looks like it has qualified personell.
Qulaified personell that does nothing but pay huge money to skilled free lenacers to sort things out.
The problem no phsicist could ever solve is to find a meaningfull corelation between what Newton tought universe is made of and running on, and his invention, Gravity, that nobody could comprehend, explain or determine, but they managed to calculate it's effect on Earth and the living beings, with the Theory of Relativity proposed by Einstein where time, and space, and by consequence gravity, are realtive to... some arbitrary measure you pick up at will, and you can change your mind anytime you want and pick another one, and latter on with Quantum Phisics, that Eisntein knew about and never made anything of it till the last breath he took.
Other scientists latter on tried their hand at this, unifying the theories and hoping to find common grounds to determine a formula that would comprehend and reveal everything as a single science, and failed miserably, I will mention a few here like Neil de Grease Tyson or Michio Kaku, but the list is far longer.
I looked into their attemps and seem to have found some logical reason: ignorance. They all choose to ignore things that were not comfortable for them to work with, such as... reality.
One thing they ignored is the Atom compostion,they got stuck to Electrons spinning around Nucelus (not true, not happening in reality) where said Nucleus is made of Protons and Neutrons that stick together by Superglue they cold not explain or replicate and latter dubbed "weak forces", who'se forces?
The real reason is they ignored one magic component, the Morons, they are not at sub atomic levels,they are in the Academy, occupying every 6 seats out of 3 available, same like in the Corporations, Banking, Government, Medicine or Education.
The Morons make a living out of not findingt them answers, the reasearch is their daily bread, and not finding the answers by shunning down and kicking out whomsoever could find them is how they put butter on their bread.
Because if answers are found, research is over, and so are the money.
And so is born the Scientific Consesus, a dogma that states the Science is anyting the money making group say it is; as long as the money comes, to keep the status quo unchanged, unquestioned, unchallenged.
Wosoever dares questioning the Science (well... this is real Science, questioning everything, especially the Established Science and Scientific Consensus in the first place) is to be eliminated from the Academia for edangering their income, and eventualy elimianted form life too, but discretly.
And this is how we got the Absurd to reign in our lifes, with Scientific Academic and Political support backed up by big money provided by Banking system and Corporatons that all have the same common goal, not finding the answers, or their money dries up.
A comedian used to say that progress should of being stopped in the 90'es.
Life in the 70s and 80s in the Western Europe and NATO countries was the height of contemporary civilization.
Eastern Europe and China/Asian countries entered the spot on moment, when it was over and the civilisation was about to die in lack of resources, including fresh blood.
We had no idea that it would take another 2 or 3 decades for the dead body of the Western Civilisation to stay afloat by eating up the East alive.
Now they have consumed it to the bones, Eastern Europe is dry and dead like the west, Asia is about to succombe, China fights back but to stay alive they must break appart form the Parasitary Western Civilisation, and they do so aligning themselves to BRICS group.
With the Bear it seems that the Wstern World is chocking up, they tried to dry them up and the damn Russinas fought back, they would not let themselves be termianted alive so that Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Bruxelles, Etc., can survive.
A new world order is coming up, the BRICS pact is our new slavery based society.
Wen the Western World Civilisation Group will die, not without a big fight mind you, leaving all of us at the mercy of Moskow and Beijing, and trust me, from the little I know from history in the past 200 years or so, they have no mercy, at all.
As in any pyramid system, fascist, communist, socialist, capitalist, democratic, theocratic, technocratic, the first to rise to power are bandits, it doesn't matter that the system was started by honest people and with love for what they do, as soon as they get power the bandits will climb the scheme pushing each other to the top so they can steal.
The honest Romanian Fascists (legionnaires) died shot in the back by the ariviste legionaries clinging to power prior to world war II, the few who escaped died in the communist prisons after the world war II, the bandit legionnaires, arivistes and traitors became communists overnight, torturers in the communist prisons, party activists, etc., because the party needed professionals, so they wiped their history with a sponge, new name, new county, and at work as before.
Whoever argues about the Legionnaires because they were good or bad is a brat and has not understood history, the same applies to those who hate communism and argue with those who praise communism.
The entire history of human politics is nothing but the history of bandits and criminals climbing to power, legislating their right to be in power, legalizing their methods of staying in power, and their battle against the civil population that they milk and oppress, in any way or form of classical or modern feudalism (fascist, communist, socialist, capitalist, democratic, theocratic, technocratic, constitutional monarchy, republic and any other form of pyramidal society).
Lots of people are happy to talk about the problems with science because they want a justification for their desire to keep driving a big car and to keep eating lots of meat.
But they're a lot less sceptical when it comes to science that validates their preferences.
And that is true on the opposite crow also.
Still, my car is very small and has a huge mileage pe gallon (around 60- 70 miles per gallon), I love vegetables and occasionally eat some meat, but mostly avoid it for health reasons, industrial farmed meat is toxic, same for vegetables, but at least I can grow my own without toxines mainly, so I kind of thrust them more a bit.
I don't eat canned food or processed food by any industry, and stay away from restaurants and fast food places.
However when it comes to science...
I trust it even less than fast food, far less...
might be because I know what I am doing, I understand a lot and most of the things I see passed for science is nothing but bad politics shoveled down the throat of dumb masses by a bunch of crooks living on big money to do just that.
Lie to you.
Money is not property of the bearer, money is property of the issuer.
In USA the Federal reserve own the money for example, similar institutions work similarly for other countries, the bearer is only authorised to keep them as accounting method of the value accounted for that cannot be otherwise proven.
Unlike real estate or objects that bear their own value and need no money to express it, other values like intellectual property for instance cannot be given away psically like a house, so they are passed to the next bearer only on paper, using money to ascertain their value in the transaction documents, even if no actual money change hands but an object is given for the said value, like you write me a song and I give you my car for it, so now I own my song written by you for the value of the car, that in the contract we put down in US Dollars becasue that is the money we decided to express the transaction instead of expressing it in Rubles for exmaple, thou we could of, is perfectly legal to express it any way you want.
Money is debt, USA Federal Reserve issuing a debt bond in dollar notes, that the bearer (members of the public, individuals and businesses) handle to account for their un expressable assets (or liabilities) by existing phisical means like property, goods, etc. When the Federal Reserve gets their money back as taxes or by other menas they extinguesh that portion of debt they issued.
You practically hadle as values somebody elses debt to you, that is all.
Scientific consesnus can only be obtained via orchestrated targeted financing with T&C attached, hence scientific consensus is anything but science.
Goodhart's law. "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."
China, India, Russia, Iran, etc, are merelly catching up with what US and Europe were doing for decades now, if not for over a century, where genuine works never get published because... it contradicts the trend established by the money providers and their politcal minions, while bullshit papers get published because... backed up by big money and a powerfull political machine, and every now and than retracted because too baltantly fake, and now you get angry because the rest of the fake world and their fake as our academia people are competitng with our fake academia and beat us at our own game of faking academic research papers... lol.
University research is a for profit business. They have to give the funders what they want or else they go out of business. "Science" is much more fraudulent than most people have yet understood,
In academia it only counts if it's published in an scientific journal. The more famous the journal the better. It's how you get grants and keep your employment.
Publicly funded research is chosen by committees, who take input from researchers who review the submissions. People who want to challenge current research are reviewed by people who created the current research.
Peer review is not the way things should go, one can always make a pact with other 10 scmamers to peer review eachother and always win, in fact this is how is been working for decades now.
Replicating the experiment with same results should be the way, replicating with the intent to fail it and find if the whole thing is not a scam or plagiarism. Once a paper is pubblishesd everybody in the sector should try to replicate the experiment, just for the fun of finding out if it is a fake paper or not, also everybody should hunt down plagiarism, and those two sectors is where the money should go, unmasking the fake.
Obviously big companies and corporations, and most governments, will never agree to funding that.
Because... poatatoes.
This issue runs way deeper than just "quantity over quality". There is plenty of politics involved here, the least of all people seeking promotions. Corporations trying to insulate their products from contrary research; political parties trying to falsely legitimize questionable public policy; biased scientists steeped in dogma trying to push their own precious ideologies. Science is not as 'objective' as people like to think it is. Never was, never will be.
This is why you should always question the science, not trust it.
Trust nothing, it is just not science, at all... only propaganda, money backed propaganda dressed as science that no one is authorised to question, and if questioning it is a no go, than for me that is a religion, not science, and I am not a religious person by definition.
The interview must be digested slowly.
It is true that Tuckson lost control of the interview in the first phase, but journalism is by no means the hysterical parody of the semi-illiterate "big" media barking pekeneeze at the guest in order to force them to respond according to their expectations.
I admit, at first I also had this impression that Putin did not answer any of the relevant questions.
Later I re-watched the Interview and understood that some complicated questions cannot have simple answers.
It takes a lot of intelligence and a complex rational way to understand the answers.
I think Tuckson was very frustrated that the answers he received were diplomatic rather than direct.
But he did not abandon the journalistic approach and "hung on" to the statements of the interlocutor as any professional journalist would do.
At the beginning of the interview he seemed genuinely disturbed by the way Putin chose to treat the issue from a historical point of view, clearly he had not come there for a history lesson and expected something else.
He later proved his intelligence in that he began to understand that there were no simple answers to his questions.
Above all else he showed patience and tact.
You claim that you did not understand what was relevant and probably relatively new after this interview.
If you have the patience to watch it again, possibly in bits and pieces, you will have an answer.
Purely subjectively, for me, there were many relevant elements: the first and most important is that Putin understood the current new economic and political realities, in opposition to the Western political class that seems intellectually anesthetized; the second relevant thing is that he understood that in the USA it is not the political class that leads but someone else (he says the elites), so decisions are not made at the political level; another relevant fact is that in light of this, he uses intelligence channels rather than diplomatic channels; that says a lot about who is running the "collective west" today.
The unasked and implicitly unanswered question is who these services answer to, but this topic has not been touched upon.
I did not have the feeling that Putin invited Poland, Romania or Hungary to the dismemberment of Ukraine, the statements cannot be taken out of context as some try.
However uncomfortable the historical truth may be for some, including Russians, Putin did not shy away from bringing it to the attention of public opinion.
This shows that he is a very different type of politician from the ones we have today.
Some see in this interview another way of making propaganda and others see another point of view unknown in the Western environment, as well as another way of doing politics, if necessary including by force.
In any case, the interview is far from trivial or uninteresting.
Not that the old one was broken, just to change something, therapeutical shopping.
- I recommend this one, the seller told me. It is created on the basis of a highly performing revolutionary technology.
- Well, what makes it different from other freezers? I wondered.
- It no longer works on the basis of freon, but uses an experimental substance that enters food and genetically modifies it, suddenly turning it into frozen products.
- Well, isn't it, God forbid, toxic?
- Our specialists assume it is not.
- Interesting! It probably freezes everything quickly and efficiently.
- In principle, yes, but for now it is not known if it can keep the products at the optimal temperature, so you will have to periodically put ice packs in the drawers.
- Do I understand that there is a risk of my food defrosting from time to time?
- There is, but it is quite small. However, for added safety, you should store them once a month in another freezer, which you can rent from us.
Do you think I'm going astray here?
Just see how the Plandemic puncturing mandatory volunteering thing was pushed on us.
You will understand that there are customers in this world for the above freezer any time day or night.
That one is easy, all you need is to beat the piston engines cars at their own game,just like the piston engine cars did when they took over the market from electric cars a century or two ago.
So what made them piston engine so popular? Was it that they were working on internal explosions using liquefied dinosaurs to produce horses (HP)
Not really, it was mostly due to several factors.
-Price was lower, I mean so much lower, some 10% of an electric car of equal capacity.
-Range was bigger, I mean huge in comparison, an electric car was dead in 30KM than it took a night to recharge, the dynosaurus liquefied horses instead could go 300Km with one tank, refilable in 20 minutes.
- Cars were simple to mantain, you neded nearly no education, just a few days with a friend that knew how to trim a carburateur, adjust the steering or the brakes, and for life you were master of your own vehicle. But for the electric ones the battery.... now that was an issue to learn how to understand it.
-If your fuel tank went bad, pierced, rusted, got stolen, etc, the cost to replace it was maybe worth one or two days of salary, and the skills to replace it... not needed any. To replace the battery instead you had to buy them for a few month, maybe 6 or 12 months worth of salary, and they were heavy, so replacing them was not easy.
- not to ignore weight, a liqefied dynosaurs powered car was half the weight of a battery powered one, so for the same air pressure in your tires, you could carry more cargo without popping them with too much weight.
But today electric cars are damn complicated,
-have multiple layers of lines of codes in various computers on board to keep it from going bizark,
-they catch fire out of the blue,
-explode with you inside,
-release toxic fumes in the process so that if the fire does not cook you crisp, or the explosion does not send you stright to heaven, you die regardless, from fumes poisoning in seconds.
-and if your battery goes bust it will cost you the money of TWO piston cars brand new just to change that
-not to mention the Electric Vehicle itself costs to buy like a villa
-takes hours to recharge the battery
-and it lasts you on the roads less time than it took to recharge
-They are heavy like a bulldozer
-and their maintennance... you need a few doctorates in engineering, electronics, computer coding and hacking to keep up with owning an EV.
So to make the Electric Vehicles a success story again, I identify here several simple solutions:
-The acquision cost should be less than 10.000 Euro for the base model, no extras, no luxuries, capable to take 5 pasengers and their lagguage.
-The replacement battery should cost including the batteries themselves less than 500 Euro
-The battery lifetime should be minimum 10.000 discharge and recharge cycles
-Batteries recharging time less than 30 minutes from zero to full
-Bateries should not weight more than 50Kg alltogehter
-Batteries should be safe, no catching fire under any conditions, including throwing a hand greande at them, no explosions, no toxicity released.
-Maintnenance should be doable by any teenager after hanging aroung a friend that knows how to fix it for a weeks or two tops.
-Computerwise, it should have none as a base model, should run analog entirely. Computers for geeks only.
Do that and I guarantee you nobody will ever want to drive with a dead dynosaur liquefied under their seats, trust me.
Given the past 30 years history of humanity, for the first time in this spaiens species human societies we could actually communicate online cross borders and cross continents despite the governments trying hard to control the narrative and lie to us as they did for milenia.
Based on that we could see for ourselves that the enemy is not somebody in "the other country" or of "the other political colour" or other religion, but our own politicians, they were always the enemy, liyng to us, extracting wealth from us for our own demise and their own benefit, in every single country, administration, colony or kingdom.
And now they call again for war, globally, factions are determined, alliances are created, bonds of power are tied, populations are sacrificed, nations wealth is looted by it's own politicians in charge, but... they canot find soldiers: most armies, east and west, norht and south, white, yellow, red or black, are not meeting their government recruitment quota, sometimes not even half of that.
No men or women are willing to go die or murder for their own country, government, politicians; and the very few that do join the forces are proven to be socipatic narcisistic psychopats goons looking for a cover under government guise to can go out there and take lives, so that they do not land in jail for doing it out of government protection umbrella.
But no normal humans are anylonger willing to join the army, they cannot be fooled anylonger with empty words, those people are not coward, on the opposite, the ones that join the army and police etc., are the cowards, those that do not are the brave ones, they know whom the enemy is, and are ready to fight back if needed.
In case of war I can see more people taking up arms to fight against their own government (in any given country) than for their government.
It's comical, an insect needs to breathe more often for the same weight, so for the same weight it produces three times as much CO2, which is fine with me, it helps the trees to grow big and beautiful.
Then, for the same weight, an insect has more "bones" than "meat", so it is necessary to eat three times as much to cover the same protein requirement, which will lead to the production of CO2 per kilo of consumable protein of approximately 6 times respect to the beaf, pork, or other political animals that wander around television or write bullshit online and offline.
And that's fine with me because this way plants grow stronger and more beautiful, by consuming CO2.
So there are no problems here, since we have always eaten insects, especially on horseback and on a motorbike, but also on a bicycle and a scooter, especially without a helmet as a rider.
But... if the cows, pigs, etc. from a farm away escape from their stables, they will make a killing around your crops until you catch them and put them back in again. Let's make a large breeding farm, ten thousand animal heads. Massive damage, proportions comparable only to the damage done by the tax man in your life.
However, if the insects escape from your farm, let's say from a small farm, ten million (and an apartment is enough to raise them), in three days they are 100 million, in two weeks they are one billion, in one month they are billions of billions, nothing stops them, they fly over rivers and fences, they raze everything that can be eaten to the ground, harvest fields, forests, golf and football fields (those that are not synthetic, however), leaving all the animals, including humans, dead of hunger...
Only the ocean and the North Pole stops them fro crossing from continent to continent.
However, if in a coordinated way tens of farms accidentally lose billions of insects each, cautiously on every continent and island, what happens is, you know, well, you do the math...
You cannot calm down the storm.
Calm down yourself, and face the storm.
Going desperate about a situation you cannot avoid or change is not solving your problem, changing your circumstances so when the situation hits you than it finds you ready to resist untill it passes and you can raise again; seems to be a more of a wise option.
That also involves situation awarness, you cannot prepare yourself to be resilient and master yourself during bad times unless you are fully aware such times might come, what would they look like, what resurces you need to gather to cope with the situation, what knowledge you need to achieve to handle such resurces thoughtfully and wiselly, whom can you count on, and whom can count on you.
That involves building ties with some sort of comunity that is looking into similar options, might have gathered knowledge, might think otherwise than you do hence see things that you have missed from your assesements, and so on.
That involves communication with people, groups, and obviously scammers that want to make a living on your fears, desires, needs or wants, and especially on your naivety.
And that involves building the ability to segregate good info from bad intel, good people from parasites, and the ability to belive nothing just because said so by somebody in some authoriatarian position such as a politician, minsiter, bank president, medical doctor or some top scientist, because everybody will convincingly lie to anybody as long as the money is good to do that, so trusting is fair enough, but verifying is not an option, it is the only way.
The easiest method to kill hundreds of milions and play the Saviour Card is to pretend you do it for their own good, you "save them" from some immaginary evil, such as CO2 and Methane gases coming out from ... plants growing and cow farting.
So they need to stop growing plants, for food evidently, and that will lead to massive famine, and hundreds of milions of deaths in the coming years.
Stalind did that in USSR, Mao did that in China (his excuse was the birds eating in the crops...) Churchill did it in India... they did it in Uganda (chasing away all the farmers that know how to cultivate the land) they do it now in South Africa using the Uganda Method of chasing away the farmers.
And now Ursula Von Der Leyen, Klaus Schwab and others are pusing for the same agenda world wide, because it happens to work fine thank you, you promote that with the might of state institutions behind you, people believe you for a couple of years, and voila... starvation on a large scale killing hundreds of milions in a few monts.
They also want farmers to raise locusts and grasshoppers for food, your food.
Immagine what happens when thousands of farms doing that, each raising trillions of locusts per years, accidentally let them loose into the wild... in a week all planet will look moslty like the Sahara dessert, no plants alive anywhere because... ups, it was an accident, a global accident I might ad...
In a mind-boggling proposal, the World Economic Forum has reportedly entertained the idea of banning rice production as a solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
See the video of each of their proposal online, easy to find them on Youtube, Odysee, Ramble, Vimeo, and many other portals.
In Europe they are banning the land owners from cultivating their lands by various methods, one of them is state subsidies to not cultivate your land (I have relatives owning hundreds of hectars of land and being paid to let it uncultivated, not even cutting the hay they can now)
Another one is forbidding families to raise their own animals for family needs; like pigs, chicken, cows etc, or forbidding families to use their lawn for crops for family needs, you can only have grass lawn and that needs to be cut short or they evict you from your own property.
Because apparently, in their parallel universe, the world can do without some of the most widely consumed staple foods, and millions of people can simply forget about their beloved sushi and biryani, sarmale or bread, cokies and pastry, etc.
One can only imagine the uproar from rice-loving nations and the bread and pasta loving nations in the other hemisphere, and the perplexed looks on the faces of farmers who have been cultivating the grain for centuries so you can have bread on the table.
Dutch farmers are in uproar for over a year now against their government that wants to take away their lands so they cannot cultivate it, and now the German farmers are taken the streets too.
It seems the folks at the World Economic Forum have cooked up a scheme that will murder most of the population if various countries will bend over and apply it!
It happen in the past, and now they propse it again, for their own beneft naturally, not yours obviously, you are the ones they try to kill after all.
Researchers in general are a bunch of scoundrels who don't know much about anything, but they know how to get funds the hard way, eat them up big time, and they give results as they should, that is, as they are instructed by the source of income.
A few years ago they also understood that cows dream, as well as chickens and fish and all other animals.
Every peasant knew this from the Romans time onwards, but not the researchers and other scientists and academics, they didn't...
And someone more vegan told them... look; here is some big time money, now you know too like farmers knew, make a fuss about this topic so that the world stops eating animals for those dream too like us, eat crickets since those don't dream (they say).
And worms, yes, make sure to make them flour sou you don't loose apetite from the appearance on your plate.
Appearance matters. Worms with green parsley, enjoy your meal.
Yes, the black ops, the one with the plandemic blew up in a year or two, they hoped it would last for about 10 years.
The masters of the current narrative panicked.
They beggd with Putin and Zelinsky to put on a war farce for a decade or so.
It blew out their nosees in a year, since then they've been dragging the stretcher through the televisions because no one gives a shit about this program anymore.
Then they begged Netanyahu to do something monumental, that's what Bibbi told the Mossad to bring out Hamas, and now we have the circus again,on bread, but it deflates quickly, another 6 months and they lose the consumer's attention in front of the TV again.
They keep pleading with Xi to enter Taiwan, maybe... for now they patched up with the Houthis temporarily, and they resuscitated the Somalis to help them out, it won't last long, the world is already bored with so much low budget suspense.
Their quality is more like there were movies with Steven Segal, nothing professional.
So, in preparation with fanfare and drums... Aliens....
They will be very advanced beings, technologies unmatched on the planet (well, to keep the scheme functional, they have been preparing for 30 years by dumbing down the population and destroying the state and private educational system, you'd have to be stupid to believe that, so they made all more stupid)
And above all they will not have a body (where have I heard of this before?, ah yes, in the Bible, devils do not have a body, they have to occupy the body of people or animals to run on our hardware as they are only software)
Now, fight with some incorporeal ones, but who have intergalactic bombs, shoot at you with laser guns, masser weapons, and taser weapons, occupy anyone's brain (you gonna see what the queue will be of hypochondriacs who in the plandemic walked around with a mask on their nose and 17 boosters in their arms that there was no more room on the body to insert another needle), who all disappeared overnight and reappeared as experts in Slava Ukraini, with flags and everything on the doors and windows, which are now badly disoriented if Slava continues or Let's go Neaniahu... (as Ukraina is a form of Gaza while Israel is a form of Russia) ups... transition, hard uphill, they will all suddenly be "possessed" by aliens, for a nice bank account of course, as none of them before worked for free.
I went on a bit too long, but I don't know how to be enigmatic and universally valid in predictions like Nostradamus, me, I am more Nostamasculus Mentulantes ad Mentula Cannem.
By Ovidiu Gheorghe Ruta
Morning!
I want to write a trilogy.
Let me explain briefly, let's see if we have customers. (Whoever adds value appears in the co-authors.)
Give a heart emojy if we have customers and a tearful and yellow face if you don't give a sod or something like that.
The first book should be called 1776.
It seems that those from the 13 colonies are dissatisfied and would put of a small revolution or something like that, so they have to ask King George to approve that "Yes you can" and that where and than when.
They ask allright, King George presses the button on his abacus and says, from where a good British series was inspired: "Computer says no."
They're angry, so King George, to calm them down, tells them "you know what, look give time another year and we'll reassess".
So they let the matter go, that it was illegal anyway, that what to do if you don't have permission from the twat at the prefecture, or the Epstein at the girls' school?
They got carried away with work, the daily troubles, the hard work of making childrens and at the past for a year, forget to make any more requests.
And they remain British colonies under the name of FUK, The Federation of UK.
The second book, 1948, is about how George Orwell became prime minister of the MIB, the Great British Empire, and how he appointed Aldous Huxley as the Minister of Culture and what social-political reform followed from there.
The third book, 2030, is about the adventures of some Romanian deputies in the Chezaro-Imperial Parliament of the Austro-Romanian Empire, but mostly about how they do nothing there day in and day out.
That's about it, yes, anyway, it's already too much.
Are you in?
