Just like in the case of COVID, the war in Ukraine has a horror of protests.

So if you want to stop the war, allyou have to do is protest NON STOP against it, in every country, capital city, regional capital,province capital, block the military complex outlets, bases, manufacturing and stocking places, airports and ports, so they cannot move without causing an uprising.

That is what they fear most, people protesting against their deeds, that cuts their funds off, politicians all of a sudden have to make a choice:

A) Either they receive the bribes promised to push for war, but they lose their voters, hence no re elections,

or

B) they get less bribes, but stay longer in office,

and any politician that respects themselves knows that staying longer in office is more profitable than making now more bribes and getting thrown out of the key position at the elctions, losing any furhter bribing chance.

That is why they want to be elcted in the first place, to get bribed.

The war will end when the common man refuses, out of their own pockets, to accept it's funding in daily prices rising.

As with COVID, the war will end when the common man refuses to accept it's funding in daily prices and takes to the streets to protest, for wars are only momentarelly funded by govenrment stash cash, then all stash is rebuild from your pockets by raising pricies to just about anything.


Just like in the case of COVID, the war in Ukraine has a horror of protests.


In today's society, it is no longer possible to shoot protesters as it happened in the USA once every few years from 1886 until the Second World War.


Big industrialists and bankers cannot risk not having support from the majority, that would lead to nobody buying nothing from them, hence bankruptcy.
Maybe we shouldactually do just that, bankrupt them each time they think we are cattle and they can prey on us.

Toxic ideologies around... really?

All ideologies are toxic and when you have ideological obsessions, no matter if they are for or against, you are just easier to manipulate.

And conservatism has always been about the preservation of privileges, but since with the universal vote, in order for the aristocracy to be able to preserve its privileges, it also needs the vote of the people, that's why they use the pretext of "conservation of values" and try, through social conservatism, to preserve class and economic privileges.

And, precisely, in order to have a better society for all, we must cure our homophobia/transphobia, racism, misogyny, etc. so as to leave without imaginary enemies all the incompetent/corrupt/autocrat politicians who otherwise are not able to win votes because they are not able, nor interested, to do anything good for the lives of the citizens.

And when I talk about Aristocrats, I intend both the left liberals that cal themselves progressives, and the right conservatives, because yes, they present to you as two different political orietnatons but they art not, they are the same thing, aristocrats seeking votes to validate whatever they will latter on decide to impose upon you as "yourt fault mate, you voted us up here" and trust me, they both sides will propose same identical laws, just worded in a different way. And not in your favour anyway.

Why do you have to kill everybody on this planet (and others) if they don't submit to you bias?

Yes, I know what you are thinking, this is about wokism... Nope and yerp.

It includes them among other fascists and antifascists, commies and anticommunists, globalists, talebans, inclusivists, climate changer activists, climate change deniers, global warming activists, global warming deniers, pro Putin, against Putin, pro Zelinsky, against Zelinsky, pro Biden, pro Trump, KKK activists and Black lives matter activists, and those that are against them, and so on and so forth.



You got the idea.



I can never wrap my head around this thing: Why can't we agree to disagree and live with it. Have a beer over it, talk over it and not hate each other because of our difference in opinions, ideas, ideologies, faith, believes and scopes in life?



Multitude of ideas, approaches, believes, opinions and their clash into a debate is what brings out progress, enhances our experiences, makes us better, why instead of having our ideas clash we prefer to physically clash onto each-other because of our differences, what is with this morbid craziness of "if you disagree with me than you hate me and must die" thing?

No I do not hate you, I just happen to disagree with this one on your side and maybe agree with another of your ideas, so how comes that if I disagree with an idea you have than I hate you but if I do agree with an idea you have than I do not love you, I just kiss up?



What contorted line of thinking is that?



What kind of mental yoga is that, Olympics Gymnastics of Twisted Thinking level.