skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Money is debt, money is a token as evidence of debt of the one whom has emitted them towards the one whom received them.
Money is not wealth, if I give you land, products, my time, that is wealth I gave you, and you give me a trading token in exchange, that does not make me wealthy, makes me holder of some obligations of yours in my pocket, you are wealthy, you have my products, I have money, a reminder of your debt with me, until I get rid of said debt in exchange o some real wealth they can burn anytime and I am left with no evidence you owe me something.
Economics 101.
Incidentally the word sin means debt.
If we have a debt based economy it's arguable we have a sin based economy.
Which gives new meaning to the phrase how the love of money is the root of all evil.
9 billion people: if we all lived in a house with a garden that we would all fit in the Alaska Peninsula or in Spain.
And the garden here if instead of lawn it would produce vegetables and fruits would be 50% of the food needs for a family of three, or if built up; the greenhouse vertical model; 4 times more than we can eat.
So the story of overpopulation does not hold water.
However, it is not the population that is to blame for climate change, but the corporate industry, and 90% of that production is useless, designed to break down urgently so as not to reduce profits, scheduled obsolescence.
If it produced quality; then 90% of the industry would be useless, a good thing to live longer, cleaner, and without the need for money to keep buying what breaks down by design, just to make them profit, which in turn generates wars for resources to make a profit.
However, 50% of global production is for war and 80% of global pollution is generated in wars.
Eliminate the scheduled obsolescence and you no longer have a crisis of resources, eliminate wars and this reduces pollution to 1% hence the Gretina no longer has anything to protest, goes jobless.
So it's not about overcrowding the planet, it's about stupidity and greed.
The worlds larges plant capturing carbon was cut off and burned to ground, it was the Amazonian forest, and the ones in Borneo, Romania, Ukraine, etc.
Iceland has built a mechanical machine that cannot collect as much carbon as a single sequoia tree per year, pur technological bullshit that eat up huge ammounts of money and a long time to build, nt to mention ore,mineralsand polluting processing of them.
I am not shaming Iceland, just the whole of the humanity.
What we need to do is plant more forests and do not bomb them that are planting more trees... how about stop waging war against those that plant forests? Just for starters.
In the timeframe to build such a plant and with the funds eaten up to build such a plant, you can plant milions of hectars of trees in a few months, and by the time the factory is built have already by simply growing up captured more carbon than the machine could capture in it's entire life cycle.
And onwards each year the forest will capture more carbon, year after year for some ... eternity... at a rate of carbon capture per year bigger than the plant can capture in it's entire life cycle, when you have to spend more money to dismantle and replace the plant (forest revives itself automatically if not cut down) and still have to do something with the captured carbon in the plant, while a forest uses it as food to grow itself, replace itself when old, replenish itself when damaged.
Replacing mother nature with machines is bad from any perspective, planting trees is dirty cheap, so it is watching them grow, and the ecological cost is recovered in a year or less, and for the lifetime of that forest will free of any charge in money or lives, provide clean oxygen to any living being on earth.
A machine costs not only big money to produce far less oxygen per capital invested, but also does a huge ecologycal damage to the planet just to extract the minerals needed and to process them into the final product, The Machine,, impact that cannot be recuperated in the entire lifespan of the machine.
Besides without impartial trees to supply oxygen to just about anybody breathing on earth, the machines can be turned off by those in power if one place or another dares thuinking not alongside the aproved line of thought by the Ministry of thought, in other words business as usual for the sociopaths in power that canot be bothered by the existence of a forest that does not obey their orders to stop supplying oxygen to whosoever dares thinking with their own brains, so cut it of, burn it down, to can control the air supply.
On a different note, what animal and vegetal species thrive in a machine?
How about in a forest?