Tu bei ori not to bei, la o plainca, asta-i intrebarea.
Pai daca vrei, bei, daca nu vrei, ... vrei nu vrei, bea Grigore aghiasma!
Asta e raspunsul, politically correct.
Noi am fost Daci de cand lumea si pamantul, ramurica de Traci ca si alte natii pe aici, acum mai mult sau mai putin disparute.
Chestia e ca noi nu am disparut, si asta a deranjat pe multi mai recent.
Cand in ultimele 3000 de ani am fost noi Romani? Pai nu prea pana de curand, eram Daci, Valahi, Ardeleni, Moldoveni, si hop deodata au inceput sa ne pompeze in cap idea cu Romanii, ca de... asa se poate face ce vor ei si sa disparem si noi din istorie.
Acum ca suntem Romani, a inceput sa devina ilegal sa numesti alte natiuni conlocuitoare minoritare pe numele lor vechi, e insultator, deci Tigani devin tot Romani, dar ca le mai punem un "r" minuscul dupa prima litera ca sa facem ceva deosebire, deci Rroma, Rromani, etc.
Deosebirea o facem noi, celelate popoare nu o fac, deci noi suntem Tiganii Europei, pardon Rroma, ca sa nu fac puscarie ca spun adevarul cu cuvinte nepotrivite legal.
Si se gasesc unii sa incerce sa forteze istoria inapoi la denumirea de Tigan pe baza absurdei idei ca la un studiu de opinie publica 98% din populatie a zis ca asa vor ei sa fie.
Considerand ca din toti locuitorii tarii asteia cam 7% ar fii Tigani, si sa zicem ca toti cei 2% care nu vor revenirea la denumirea de Tigan ar fii de ai lor, adica Tigani care acum se dau Rrom, raman asadar doar 5% din cetateni care sunt Rrom dar vor sa fie mandri Tigani ca pe vremuri, iar de unde 2% e mai mult decat 5%, rezulta matematic ca cei ce doresc revenirea la vechea denumire de Tigan dintre Rromi sunt o minoritate, iar majoritatea, adica 2%, le place sa fie Rromi.
Ce ti-e si cu statistica asta.
Am o idee, si sa nu ziceti ca nu pot sa am idei, ca se revolta Hitler si Stalin in pamant de ciuda, nici macar la ei nu era interzis sa ai idei, era doar interzis sa spui cuiva ceva despre ele...
Lasam Tiganii in pace sa se cheme Rrom pana la sfarsitul veacurilor, muschii lor, treaba lor, pentru mine tot Gujrati, Katchii, Goa, Punjabi sunt.
Hai sa revenim noi la vechea noastra denumire de DACI, si cu asta basta.
Tara asta sa se numeasca DACIA, iar limba noastra sa fie DACICA MODERNA (sau DACA, ca daca nu... la altitudinea Academie Lingviste DACE).
Bineinteles ca cei ce au facut si desfacut ca sa devina Tiganii de pe vremuri Rroma de azi o sa aplice aceasi metoda ca sa ii faca Daci.
Deci prin introducerea unui "r" imediat dupa prima litera a numelui vor fi si Rromi asimilati Dacilor devenind legal Draci.
Nu ca ar fii mare diferenta pentru restul popoarelor, dar pentru noi cel putin ar fii clar cu cine avem de a face.
Chestie de semantica.
domenica 12 giugno 2016
sabato 7 maggio 2016
Not only INRI, Jesus the Nazarene King of the Jews...
Non solo INRI, Gesù Nazareno re dei Giudei…
in the link the original text by Daniele Di Luciano in Italian
In The Exodus 20,2 God reveals his name to Moses:
“I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.”
The very word translated with “the LORD” is the famous Tetra-gram that the Hebrews have a hard time pronouncing: “YHWH“, vocalizing it in various way amongst which “Yahweh“. The four Hebrew letters that form it are: “יהוה“, yod-he-waw-he. We shall remind you that the Hebrew is to be read from right to left.
In the Gospel according to John, chapter 19 verses 16-22, we read:
“16 Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away.
17 And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha:
18 Where they crucified him, and two other with him, on either side one, and Jesus in the midst.
19 And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.
20 This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.
21 Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.
22 Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.”
Although this text being famous, the stage in front of the crucified Jesus must of being a bit different from haw we always have imagined it. John seemingly tried to underline it but the reader not being acquainted with the Hebrew language is prevented from understanding that.
The inscription John is talking about is the famous acronym “INRI“, than until nowadays is painted above any crucifix. The acronym that stands for the Latin “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum“, means exactly “JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.“.
But John specifies that the inscription was also in Hebrew. Not only that: in a such important moment the gospel writer seems to stop on certain details of little importance:
Henri Tisot, an expert of the Hebrew language, asked various rabbis to comprehend what was the exact Hebrew translation of the Latin inscription placed by Pilate. He is talking about it in his book “Eva, la donna” pages 216 to 220.
He discovered that it is grammatically mandatory, in Hebrew, to write “JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.“. in a certain way and the result is “ישוע הנוצרי ומלך היהודים“. We remind you to read from right to left.
Those letters are the equivalent of our “Yshu Hnotsri Wmlk Hyhudim” spoken as “Yeshua Hanotsari Wemelek Hayehudim“.
Therefore as in the Latin you obtain the acronym “INRI“, and for the inscription in Hebrew you get “יהוה“, “YHWH“.
Here is the explanation of the reason John pays so much attention to this situation that takes place just below the cross of Jesus. In that very instant the Jews could see the men they have asked to be killed, the one that stated his is the Son of God, with the name of God, the famous tetra-gram, just above his head.
It wouldn't work right for them that the YHWH was written there, visible to all, and they tried to convince Pilate to change it. Here is where the sentence of the roman ruler "What I have written I have written" earns a much more profound significance.
Seems incredible? Think that Jesus have had a prophecy about that very moment. In John 8,28 it says:
“Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he,”
By "lifting up" Jesus meant the crucifixion. "I AM" points to the name of God revealed to Moses in Exodus 3,14:
“14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.“
Translated in 2016, May 07
in the link the original text by Daniele Di Luciano in Italian
In The Exodus 20,2 God reveals his name to Moses:
“I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.”
The very word translated with “the LORD” is the famous Tetra-gram that the Hebrews have a hard time pronouncing: “YHWH“, vocalizing it in various way amongst which “Yahweh“. The four Hebrew letters that form it are: “יהוה“, yod-he-waw-he. We shall remind you that the Hebrew is to be read from right to left.
In the Gospel according to John, chapter 19 verses 16-22, we read:
“16 Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away.
17 And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha:
18 Where they crucified him, and two other with him, on either side one, and Jesus in the midst.
19 And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.
20 This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.
21 Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.
22 Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.”
Although this text being famous, the stage in front of the crucified Jesus must of being a bit different from haw we always have imagined it. John seemingly tried to underline it but the reader not being acquainted with the Hebrew language is prevented from understanding that.
The inscription John is talking about is the famous acronym “INRI“, than until nowadays is painted above any crucifix. The acronym that stands for the Latin “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum“, means exactly “JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.“.
But John specifies that the inscription was also in Hebrew. Not only that: in a such important moment the gospel writer seems to stop on certain details of little importance:
- the fact that many have read that inscription because the crucifixion place was close to the city,
- the most important of priests asking Pilate to modify the inscription,
- Pilate that denies their request.
Henri Tisot, an expert of the Hebrew language, asked various rabbis to comprehend what was the exact Hebrew translation of the Latin inscription placed by Pilate. He is talking about it in his book “Eva, la donna” pages 216 to 220.
He discovered that it is grammatically mandatory, in Hebrew, to write “JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.“. in a certain way and the result is “ישוע הנוצרי ומלך היהודים“. We remind you to read from right to left.
Those letters are the equivalent of our “Yshu Hnotsri Wmlk Hyhudim” spoken as “Yeshua Hanotsari Wemelek Hayehudim“.
Therefore as in the Latin you obtain the acronym “INRI“, and for the inscription in Hebrew you get “יהוה“, “YHWH“.
Here is the explanation of the reason John pays so much attention to this situation that takes place just below the cross of Jesus. In that very instant the Jews could see the men they have asked to be killed, the one that stated his is the Son of God, with the name of God, the famous tetra-gram, just above his head.
It wouldn't work right for them that the YHWH was written there, visible to all, and they tried to convince Pilate to change it. Here is where the sentence of the roman ruler "What I have written I have written" earns a much more profound significance.
Seems incredible? Think that Jesus have had a prophecy about that very moment. In John 8,28 it says:
“Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he,”
By "lifting up" Jesus meant the crucifixion. "I AM" points to the name of God revealed to Moses in Exodus 3,14:
“14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.“
Translated in 2016, May 07
lunedì 2 maggio 2016
Science versus reality, guess who is right?
Cold Fusion seems to work just fine against official scientists ignoring it.
Never mistaken the world of scientist with the reality, they do not mingle at all.
One small example is the French Academy and the scientists at Sorbone University to whom Mr. Traian Vuia presented his plans of a heavier than air flight machine years before the Wright brothers took off the ground, but they classified him as nut, dementia and impostor, so Mr. Vuia had to sort things out on his own little income and took off a few months after the Wright brothers while if the scientist would of helped a bit he could of being the pioneer of aviation long before that.
Another small example is Mr. Henry Marie Coanda who invented the turbine propelled aircraft and discovered the Coanda effect that gave aviation a boost, him as well was treated as a scumbag and impostor by the Sorbona scientists.
The conclusion is the scientists are calling themselves as such but they are not, they just hold fast to their chairs and income and deny anyone else who is really working on something revolutionary, typical reaction of rats fearing their bread, that comes from being somebody, not from really doing something.
If those guys really managed to discover something, ignore science and the universities and go to production, the so called scientists will have to adapt themselves to reality sooner or later.
I am ready to pay to have such a machine in my garage, just to prove the scientists are always wrong when it comes to acknowledge new discoveries.
Never mistaken the world of scientist with the reality, they do not mingle at all.
One small example is the French Academy and the scientists at Sorbone University to whom Mr. Traian Vuia presented his plans of a heavier than air flight machine years before the Wright brothers took off the ground, but they classified him as nut, dementia and impostor, so Mr. Vuia had to sort things out on his own little income and took off a few months after the Wright brothers while if the scientist would of helped a bit he could of being the pioneer of aviation long before that.
Another small example is Mr. Henry Marie Coanda who invented the turbine propelled aircraft and discovered the Coanda effect that gave aviation a boost, him as well was treated as a scumbag and impostor by the Sorbona scientists.
The conclusion is the scientists are calling themselves as such but they are not, they just hold fast to their chairs and income and deny anyone else who is really working on something revolutionary, typical reaction of rats fearing their bread, that comes from being somebody, not from really doing something.
If those guys really managed to discover something, ignore science and the universities and go to production, the so called scientists will have to adapt themselves to reality sooner or later.
I am ready to pay to have such a machine in my garage, just to prove the scientists are always wrong when it comes to acknowledge new discoveries.
lunedì 21 dicembre 2015
Despre prostia umana, sau cum a ajuns Dacia tara tiganilor si de ce.
Nu sunt un istoric, nu sunt un expert, nu stiu mare lucru, dar cand pute a cacat, dau ca scontat ca am calcat in ceva care este de tot cacatul.
Dupa cum vedeti nici gramatica nu stiu, scriu fara diacritice si fara filtru, taran, ce sa mai....
Hai sa analizam ceva cantece populare patriotice ROMAnesti si plecand de la ce exista mergem la ce trebuia sa fim si sa stim, dar nu mai suntem ca nu stim.
Faimosu "Eroi au fost eroi sunt inca" pe care sub neaNicu il cantam in soapta ca Erori au fost Erori sunt inca, si acum imi dau seama ca din eroare nu gresem cu nimic....
Aici textul, melodia nu o contest, e adorabila.
Pui
de lei
de Ioan
Nenițescu |
Poezia a fost pusă pe muzica compozitorului Ionel G. Brătianu. |
Eroi
au fost,eroi sunt încă
Și-or
fi în neamul românesc!
Căci
rupți sunt ca din tare stâncă
Românii
orișiunde cresc.
Adica unde cresc Românii? Oriunde numai in Dacia nu, aici au fost importati pe capul Dacilor, in acelasi lot cu Hunii si inaintea loturilor Germanice.
Scurta
analiza istorica asa cum se vede cand admiri padurea ignorand copacul
din fata, adica da-te la o parte si vezi de mai departe...
Dacia,
tara milenara care avea o grupare de limbi relativ uniforma azi
delclarate pierdute (sau dosite ca de carte ori se iveste o alta
tablita la Tartaria, dispare ca sa nu se stie ce si cum) care se
intindea de pe la Graz in Austria cel putin, si pana dincolo de
Ukraina, este cucerita in proprtie de nici 30% de romanii lui
Traian si dintr-o data toti, inclusiv cei ne cuceriti, vorbesc latina
in mai putin de un secol, limba dusmanului (vedeti, stiu si
turceste)... Hm.... tare poanta.
Si
cine erau Romanii? O adunatura de idioti manuitori de sabie,
fara neam si fara dumenzeu, din toata EurAsia, in slujba imperiului
cu capitala la Roma, in Italia, care pe langa leafa si prada mai
sperau si in cetatenia Romana, deci Romani nu erau sigur.
Ok,
cine ii comanda, pai tot o adunatura de asasini si ucigasi, care se
pusese in fruntea lor ca Senat si Imperator, unii deveniti Romani ca
mai sus, altii prin nastere din persoane devenite Romani ca mai sus,
asta pentru ca Romani nu au existat niciodata cu adevarat, rasa aia
nu exista, punct.
Amintiti-va ca Roma a fost fondata de Romulus si Remus, fugaci din Troia, si ca pe alea taramuri in acutala LAZIO din peninsula Italica se vorbea Etrusca cand au navalit ei. Deci limba latina a venit cu ei, de unde? Pai din TROIA unde asa se vorbea curent.
Si
de ce Grecii i-au batut pe Troieni mar? Din cauza Elenei care a
fugit acolo, bai da tari mai sunt basmele astea, se misca toata
Grecia sa mearga la Troia sa moara pe acolo ca sa o prinda pe aia si
sa o aduca acasa la familie, tare sentimentul asta de familie al
Greci, monolitic.
Ce
ziceti de faptul ca pe Greci ii deranja Troia care fiind o colonie
Tracica crescuse cam mult, era de bun acord cu locuitorii zonei si se
organizase in asa masura incat controlau rutele comerciale cu
Orientul indepartat facand averi peste averi pentru ei si pentru
gazdele lor orientale. Si Grecii ravneau la controlul acestor
resurse si averi.
Mi se pare mai realist.
Trecand de lacomia Grecilor care uitati-va ce bine au ajuns subt Tsipras si Merkler, daca Troianii au dus limba lor la Roma, si erau colonie Tracica care facea cap la Sarmisegetuza, dupa mine vorbau un dialect Tracic, ca la Sarmisegetuza, si uite lamurite cateva dileme.
Cum
ar fii faptul ca toata Dacia vorbeste o limba latina dupa cucerirea
Romana, pai asa au vorbit ei inainte sa fondeze indirect Roma, si
uite asa ne lamurim de ce banditii aia de Romani au atacat pe toata
lumea dar niciodata Dacia cel putin pana la Traian, pai erau ca
fratii, ca erau frati, in cardasie, comerciau impreuna, de fapt prima
natie la care s-au dat Romanii dupa ce au prins forte erau dusmanii
lor ancestrali, Grecii pe care i-au expulzat din colonia lor Italia,
apoi din Sicilia, si apoi i-au batut pe teren propriu pana in Asia
Mnor, in timp ce de la Daci cumparau cu bucurie arme harana si haine.
Si ce la apucat pe Traian sa atace Dacii? Lacomia? Oare?
Hai sa cantam mai departe:
E vița noastră făurită
De
doi bărbați cu brațe tari
Și
cu voința oțelită,
Cu
minți deștepte, inimi mari.
In realitate vita noastra e o amestecatura de te doare capul, dar prin vointa puterilor centrale Europene care plateau Telectuali indoielnici care ne-au ramas in istorie ca stalpi ai formari Romaniei mari, niste tradatori jalnici, ne-au bagat pe gat denumirea de Români, sub motivul "ca de la Râm ne tragem" ca sa uitam ca suntem DACI.
Si uite asa se nasc miscari protestatoare in sanul intelectulilor adevarati ca Eminescu si Creanga, care au mirosit duhoarea, ca chemandun-ne Români putem fi asimilati cu Rroma, adica Tiganii, si exterminati lent sa le revina tara asta lor, de origine din India, Gujarati, Katchii, Punjabi, nicidecum din Europa, deci ne prostesc ca noi suntem urmasii Romei ca sa ne numim Romani, cand eu tin bine minte ca sa fii numit roman era o injosire acum 50 de ani inca, ca sa fi cazut in Romanie insemna sa fi cazut in saracie lucie ca Tiganii... nu va suna nici un clopotel?
Lui Mihail Eminovici, rusul nostru patriot Dac, care vroia sa ramanem Dacia, ii sunau nu un clopotel ci mii de talangi cand auzea traznaile astea.
Voi sunteţi urmaşii Romei? Nişte răi şi nişte fameni!
I-e
ruşine omenirii să vă zică vouă oameni!
Şi
această ciumă-n lume şi aceste creaturi
Nici
ruşine n-au să ieie în smintitele lor guri
Gloria
neamului nostru spre-a o face de ocară,
Îndrăznesc
ca să rostească pân' şi numele tău... ţară!
La Paris, în lupanare de cinismu şi de lene,
Cu
femeile-i pierdute şi-n orgiile-i obscene,
Acolo
v-aţi pus averea, tinereţele la stos...
Ce
a scos din voi Apusul, când nimic nu e de scos?
Da' de ce nu citit voi Scrisoarea a-III-a din perspectiva luptei impotriva tiganizarii Daciei dusa de Eminescu si Junimea, tiganizare pe care vroiau sa ne-o bage pe gat inainte de tratatul de la Trianon, facandu-ne sa devenim mandrii Români ca sa ne poata transforma incet in mandrii Rroma.
Si
uite asa l-au otravit cu mercur pe Eminescu sa scape de o pacoste.
Si doi banditi cu brate tari si cu vointa otelita, vezi mai jos cum apar ca doi amici patrioti, ia hai sa vedem ce amici earu Romanul cu Dacul de a venit cu puhoi de oaste sa ii ia gatul.
Foarte buni amici, verisori in realitate, a lui Decebal aveau in mana conducerea imperiului Dac si ai lui Traian erau si ei o trapta mai jos in administratie, mafie mare.
Vorbesc
de bunici, ca parintii erau inca pustani abia insurati, iar eroii
nostri abia incepusera sa alerge pe propriile picioare in ograda.
Și unu-i Decebal cel harnic
Iar
celălalt Traian cel drept
Ei,
pentru vatra lor amarnic
Au
dat cu-atâția dușmani piept.
Și din așa părinți de seamă
În
veci s-or naște luptători,
Ce
pentru patria lor mamă
Vor
fi mereu învingători,
Au fost eroi, și-or să mai fie,
Ce-or
frânge dușmanii cei răi,
Din
coasta Daciei și-a Romei
În
veci s-or naște pui de lei.
Hai sa plimbam ursul ca rugineste lantul, costa Daciei mai treaca mearga, dar coasta Romei? Adica toti mercenarii aia puhoi adunati din EurAsia sperand sa devina Romani daca nu isi lasau oasele intre timp pe alte plaiuri, ar fii costa Romei, hai sa radem nitel, face bine la ficat.
Si
de unde tot interesul asat al puterior mondiale (nu ma refer la
state, alea nu contează, ci la cine decide cine sa le fie regi,
presedinti si ministrii, controland banul si resursele, inclusiv cele
umane, uitati-va numai cum au scos din maneca minerii cand le
trebuiau, sa nu mai vorbesc de AlQueda sau ISIS/ISIL si avioane
pentru 9 Septembrie care se vaporizeaza la impact dar pasapoartele
pasagerilor rezista la 6000 de grade celsius... hmmm) in ultimi 500
de ani sau mai bine, de a sterge tot ce e Dacic de pe lume (si Kurdic
pe care vor sa ii inlocuiasca cu arabii, si alte natii
stravechi prin Asia, Sudamerica sau Africa, sa nu vorbim de verii
nostri Celti in vestul Europei)
lunedì 14 dicembre 2015
Receiving your parcels ordered online, what to know and what to do...
Distribution,
home delivery,
on-line ordered things on Amazon, E-Bay, Alibaba.com, Chinasources.com and other local and international selling systems is mainly done because you folks need to go to work, thus have no time to go shopping, most of the time you do this on the way home, in the train/bus/tube, using your smart-phone or tablet, sometimes you do it from home with family around your laptop, but that is a rare family reunion occasion.
Any medal has two sides, and the revers of this medal is not looking any better than the front of it, same lack of time that urges you to buy on-line is also preventing you, most of you, to be home when the delivery arrives, and here is where the trouble starts.
How many times you had your delivery days or even weeks late due to a single factor found on the "we have being here attempting to deliver" note, with a big "X" right on the "we still have your goods, you were not home to receive it" pre printed line?
How may times the neighbors refused to take your delivery for they have being fed and had enough... how about parents and relatives?
How many times the parcel have being left on your doorstep, in your rubbish bin or even worse, chuck over the fence in your garden, exposed to theft, rain, deterioration, due to a desperate attempt to deliver in your absence?
Did you ever read on your "we were here" card things like "in your blue bin" than the parcel stinks like rotten, maybe you just ordered bananas...
Or even "your parcel is delivered in the safe place" printed line completed by hand with "ups... top of your roof" sorry.
I need to remind you here that the delivery driver works for 8 hours paid, any extra hours are not paid, also I need to remind you here the driver has to do between 130 and 230 drops a day most of the times, and has 1 (ONE) minute alone to do that each single drop, any wasted time with ringing the neighbors, looking for a way to hide the parcel so you can find it, makes him work late, for free, unfed and with no access to the bathroom, add rain and cold to this, just for fun.
Why would you not take a step forward to help them help you out?
How?
Think like a delivery driver for 5 minutes, time to go from a drop to the next one,
1. look into the Satnav (G.P.S.) to see how is the access (an many times the Satnav is wrong, thus if that is the case please include in your notes the best access for them , the way you use to come home and park your car, could be a totally different street leading to your rear garden, instruct the delivery driver in the notes please, do that in the purchasing process)
2. drive there through traffic, sometimes in reverse for 100 yards (it takes what it takes...)
3. find a way to park their van (many times there is no room to drive, not to talk about parking it, simply because all folks living there for simple laziness are parking on the street by the kerb) So the driver might park on the sidewalk and if there is a grass strip will park on it ruining the grass. Don't curse the driver, curse yourselves and do something about it, like buying some cavity pavement

4. You have no driveway because you keep it as a grass surface? put the cavity pavements there too, so you have grass yard and driveway in the same time.

6. Your shed/Cabot/green house/rear porch is not in front of the house? Diver has no legal rights to deliver there regardless the notes on-line or on paper glued to your door, but INSTRUCTIONS for delivery can be given at purchase moment, this allows them to legally go in your property and put tings in your rear garden shed, otherwise they will just ignore the notes, they do not want to spend time in jail for helping you.
Talking about putting instructions for delivery, some sites make it easy, some not. Amazon is a negative example for instance, they are giving some standard options that are not matching the reality 80% of the case, so people just pick the nearest option and add a few words, it helps but not always, so in that case just hit the Customer Service button on your purchasing page, this puts you on LIVE TALK with a person that can put in your profile instructions that you cannot, as long as the instructions make sense, are legally doable and present no legal risk for Amazon, as company, for the driver as a person and for the goods themselves ("throw the parcel over my fence" is not a good instruction for instance, but : "enter my back garden via gate on left of the house, entry code is 1234XY than turn knob to right, and put the parcel in my shed", they will consider this a good instruction) You can ask them to put there a PERMANENT instruction like above, without the code, and each time you change the code just change it in the delivery notes on-line too.
7. You don't have a porch in the front, nor in the rear, no shed, no Cabot, nothing, no problem, just buy a suitable size Postal Delivery Box, have it installed (bolted in the floor or on the wall for safety) somewhere the delivery man can have access to it. What is that?

8. Las but not least, render your house findable, how? Put a darn door number that is visible from a mile, on a high position, make it from L.E.D. light so Santa can see it from the sledge in the night.
Delivery drivers hate houses with no numbers, it's confusing for them, they also hate big ceramic plates that reflect light back in their torch, with a bounty floral motifs all around and a small door number in the middle that they can only see after getting off the van and walking for 2 minutes, when they are one foot away from it.
Make your door number one foot tall, write beneath the street name, and place it above your SUV height on your wall so they can see it from the van while driving when your SUV is parked in front of your door, and if your house is 10 yards or more away from the street, put another set of door number with street name on it just by the sidewalk on a post so drivers can see them form 5 feet while driving.
9. Bonus tip, buy the largest box you can fit, if large enough you can place in it permanently a pit deep freezer on a side, and have the Iceland groceries deliver your frozen food ordered on-line in your absence in the safe box. P.S. do not forget to bring a power line in the box and plug the freezer in that thingy, just so it has a light on when you open it, for no other reason at all.
Happy shopping on-line folks.
martedì 13 ottobre 2015
Creating Ex Nihil, the Deus Ex Macchina? Nope.
I saw a video last week, one morning I was waiting my son in the car
for over an hour and had time to go online and watch it calmly. It was a presentation on a creativity doctorate works of my acquaintance Jesvir Mahil to whom I give credit for a lot of work in the sector, and sometimes I happen to disagree with some findings, but nobody is perfect, me less than others.
At a certain point in her presentation she came across the Michelangelo definition of art in which the creator of something merely discovers the "to be created" object of his creativity embedded in a pile of something else (his case the marble) and his work consisted in eliminating the excess and bringing it forward.
Than she later on argued that nowadays things have progressed and creativity is no longer a mere unburying of something concealed to the eyes of common mortals by somebody with special skills, but it has a different approach of creating new stuff ex nihil.
To start with, ex nihil does not exist, anything that is to be created or invented is already embedded in the very pattern and matrix of our system of universes, otherwise would not be creatable in the first place, or to put it simpler, if God would of not created the premises and means to create that, the creative mind included, there would be zero creativity, and even that would not stop the universe evolve, since it did it anyway for millenia without any creative brain to help it out from within, as there were no intelligent beings to acknowledge the evolution towards creative brains out of unicellular forms of life, at least on earth.
Therefore the mere creativity is nothing more that the intelligent perception of discovering new (for us) ways of using the already existent laws of the universe to obtain things we consider worth of our consideration (like money) but that other species or components of the universe (say the dolphins, or the angles) have no interest for at all.
And if you want to listen to the universe, yes you need to be quiet in your ears and in your mind, for the continuous voice of the universe is feeble compared to the noise we make, but constant in our minds, should we only decide to stop and listen.
Two main examples of creative folks struck my mind as well accepted worldwide, out of the manny other more or less known, and those are two creative minds that nobody will dare shun, Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton.
To the best of my knowledge Einstein crafted the theory of relativity that changed the way we see the whole universe, from throwing a stick for our dog to traveling to Alfa Centauri, should this ever happen.
He created this theory after he discovered (and this implies the pre existence) the relativity in his head, due to some connections he made and others did not, or if they did, they never dared to pursue the thought. Than he studied it in depth, proposed it to the world, feared he was wrong and will be shun by all, but in the end he was right. However he did not invented nor created THE relativity itslef, it was always there, as many other things we have no idea about, but will eventualy when somebody stumbles upon.
Nor Newton invented or created THE gravity, just as above, he understood a bit of the created universe and made it clear to us that did not, we simply used to fall down, now we know why.
So although we disagree upon the definition of creativity, non the less creativity helps us progress to better times, or as proven by history, to worse...
At a certain point in her presentation she came across the Michelangelo definition of art in which the creator of something merely discovers the "to be created" object of his creativity embedded in a pile of something else (his case the marble) and his work consisted in eliminating the excess and bringing it forward.
Than she later on argued that nowadays things have progressed and creativity is no longer a mere unburying of something concealed to the eyes of common mortals by somebody with special skills, but it has a different approach of creating new stuff ex nihil.
To start with, ex nihil does not exist, anything that is to be created or invented is already embedded in the very pattern and matrix of our system of universes, otherwise would not be creatable in the first place, or to put it simpler, if God would of not created the premises and means to create that, the creative mind included, there would be zero creativity, and even that would not stop the universe evolve, since it did it anyway for millenia without any creative brain to help it out from within, as there were no intelligent beings to acknowledge the evolution towards creative brains out of unicellular forms of life, at least on earth.
Therefore the mere creativity is nothing more that the intelligent perception of discovering new (for us) ways of using the already existent laws of the universe to obtain things we consider worth of our consideration (like money) but that other species or components of the universe (say the dolphins, or the angles) have no interest for at all.
And if you want to listen to the universe, yes you need to be quiet in your ears and in your mind, for the continuous voice of the universe is feeble compared to the noise we make, but constant in our minds, should we only decide to stop and listen.
Two main examples of creative folks struck my mind as well accepted worldwide, out of the manny other more or less known, and those are two creative minds that nobody will dare shun, Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton.
To the best of my knowledge Einstein crafted the theory of relativity that changed the way we see the whole universe, from throwing a stick for our dog to traveling to Alfa Centauri, should this ever happen.
He created this theory after he discovered (and this implies the pre existence) the relativity in his head, due to some connections he made and others did not, or if they did, they never dared to pursue the thought. Than he studied it in depth, proposed it to the world, feared he was wrong and will be shun by all, but in the end he was right. However he did not invented nor created THE relativity itslef, it was always there, as many other things we have no idea about, but will eventualy when somebody stumbles upon.
Nor Newton invented or created THE gravity, just as above, he understood a bit of the created universe and made it clear to us that did not, we simply used to fall down, now we know why.
So although we disagree upon the definition of creativity, non the less creativity helps us progress to better times, or as proven by history, to worse...
lunedì 14 settembre 2015
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)